Analysis for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Analysis summary
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) currently has a total score of 62 points, placing it in the strong range. The score is made up of Performance (46), Stability (89) and Trend (61). The profile is clearly uneven: Stability stands out while Performance is more neutral.
Performance scores 46 points (neutral). Most supportive metric: 1Y return at 11.1 %. Weaker metric: 3Y return at 23.7 %.
Stability scores 89 points (very strong). Best-ranked metric: max drawdown (5Y) at -19.0 %. Even the weakest metric remains solid in absolute terms: return/volatility ratio at 0.72. Higher Stability points are better and typically reflect calmer swings and smaller drawdowns—but prices can still fall.
Trend scores 61 points (strong). Key strength: trend strength at 0.90. Main drag: 12M momentum at 7.7 %.
Overall, the profile has a clear strength in Stability, while Performance is the main limiter. On a metric level, max drawdown (5Y) stands out, while 3Y return lags.
(Historical evaluation, not investment advice.)
Metrics
Performance
Stability
FAQ
- What investor type does ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF fit best in FoxScore?
- ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF fits a more defensive investor type in FoxScore: stability is the strongest part of the profile. That points to comparatively smaller drawdowns and calmer swings versus the universe — but prices can still fall.
- How meaningful is the available history for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF?
- ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF currently has about 12.4 years of price history since it started trading. That’s a solid base to interpret returns, drawdowns and trend behavior since launch — earlier market crises happened before the asset existed and are therefore not part of its history.
- What is FoxScore good for — and what is it not for?
- FoxScore is an analysis and comparison tool: it helps you sort assets quickly, compare profiles and spot strengths/weaknesses. It’s not a substitute for your own research or fundamental analysis, and it’s not a buy/sell recommendation.