Best used for
Use Performance when upside, efficiency, and risk-adjusted payoff matter more than maximum smoothness.
Score detail
Performance
Score explanation and ranking
Score ranking
Score ranking
See which assets currently lead on this score.
Top Assets
- 100
- 100
- 100
- 100
- 100
- 100
- 99
- 99
- 99
- 99
Bottom Assets
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 0
Related hubs
Jump directly into the next ranking hubs connected to this score.
Scores
Open related score rankings.
Metrics
Open the metrics behind this score.
Why use this score?
Use the right score for the right question.
Each score gives you a different view. Start here, then open the ranking, then continue into related scores or metrics.
What this score surfaces
This score asks whether returns are strong enough to justify the path taken, instead of rewarding assets for merely looking defensive or quiet.
How it differs
Compared with Overall, Performance leans harder into payoff and efficiency. Compared with Trend, it cares less about technical persistence and more about whether the delivered return was worth the ride.
What to open next
Start with the methodology, compare the live ranking, and then move into nearby return and efficiency metrics to see whether raw upside or risk-adjusted quality is doing the work.
Score explainer
Understand the score logic, FAQ context, and exact formula details.
Description
The performance score shows how well an asset has done in the past versus other assets in our universe. Instead of comparing returns manually, you get a clear ranking: is it more of a winner or more of a laggard?
We look at returns across multiple horizons (short to long term) and rank each horizon relative to all assets with data in that period. Think of it like a league table: the best return sits near 100 points, the weakest near 0, and everything in between reflects its position in the field.
Important: This is not a fixed seal of quality and not a forecast. It’s mainly a relative strength signal that helps you sort, compare, and prioritize assets - for example for watchlists, screenings, or a quick first pass.
FAQ
Why can the performance score drop even if the price barely falls?
Because the score is relative. If other assets in the universe outperform or the ranking shifts due to rolling time windows, your asset can lose points even with little price movement. This often happens when an exceptionally strong period drops out of the window or peers catch up.
What does a high performance score mean - and what does it not mean?
A high score means the asset has been among the stronger performers across multiple horizons. It does not automatically mean the asset is “safe” or that returns will continue - that’s why the stability score, trend score, and your own context matter.
When is the performance score most useful - and when is it less reliable?
It’s most informative for assets with sufficient history and stable data. It can be less reliable for very young assets, one-off events, or after regime shifts - in those cases, check stability, trend, and the individual horizons.
Formula & terms
Weights
ret_1y
10 %
ret_3y
20 %
ret_5y
30 %
ret_10y
40 %
Formula
S1 = S_high(ret_1y)
S3 = S_high(ret_3y)
S5 = S_high(ret_5y)
S10 = S_high(ret_10y)
Performance = WM( 0.10*S1 + 0.20*S3 + 0.30*S5 + 0.40*S10, default=50 )Inputs
- Return 1 yearTotal return over the last 12 months. Short horizon – reacts strongly to the current market regime.Higher is better
- Return 3 yearsTotal return over the last 3 years. Medium-term view.Higher is better
- Return 5 yearsTotal return over the last 5 years. Smoothes short-term outliers.Higher is better
- Return 10 yearsTotal return over 10 years. Can be missing for younger assets.Higher is better