FoxScore

Score guide

Overall score

Understand what this score measures.

Score ranking

Data is temporarily unavailable

The route itself is valid, but the server could not load the current dataset right now. The page stays available and should recover automatically on the next successful fetch.

Explanation

Overall summarizes Performance, Trend and Stability

The overall score rolls performance, trend, and stability into a single number so you can quickly see where an asset stands versus the rest of our universe.

Each component is ranked on a 0–100 scale and then combined with fixed weights. If a component score is missing, we compute with the available ones (weights are renormalized internally).

Liquidity, data coverage, and tokenomics risk are supporting context for interpretation, not separate top-level pillar scores.

Score structure

Three visible pillars

Performance score

Evaluates returns (mainly 1, 3, 5 and 10 years) versus many other assets. Higher is better.

Trend score

Evaluates whether the asset currently trends up (price vs SMAs, momentum, relative strength, trend strength). Higher is better.

Stability score

Evaluates stability: smaller drawdowns and lower volatility lead to more points. Higher is better.

How to interpret this score

High score means

  • The asset combines stronger Performance, Trend and Stability than many peers.
  • The signal is strongest when the pillar scores are balanced rather than driven by one extreme value.

Low score means

  • At least one major pillar is weak or the asset lacks enough evidence to compare cleanly.
  • Check the pillar breakdown before judging the asset from the single number.

Common mistake

  • Treating the Overall Score as a forecast or recommendation instead of a sorting and comparison signal.
Methodology: formula, weights and inputs

The detailed mechanics remain available here for verification, but the public interpretation should stay focused on the score meaning.

Weights

performance_score
50 %
stability_score
30 %
trend_score
20 %

Formula

Overall = WM(
  0.50 * Performance +
  0.20 * Trend +
  0.30 * Stability,
  default=50
)

Inputs

  • Performance score
    Evaluates returns (mainly 1, 3, 5 and 10 years) versus many other assets. Higher is better.
  • Trend score
    Evaluates whether the asset currently trends up (price vs SMAs, momentum, relative strength, trend strength). Higher is better.
  • Stability score
    Evaluates stability: smaller drawdowns and lower volatility lead to more points. Higher is better.

Related hubs

Continue into connected score and metric explanations.

  1. Scores

    Open related score explanations.

  2. Metrics

    Open the metrics behind the scores.

FAQ

Common interpretation questions for this score.

How does the overall score react in crashes or highly volatile markets?

In crashes, volatility and drawdowns usually jump - so the stability score often drops quickly. Trend signals can flip as well, while performance reacts more slowly depending on the horizon. The overall score often falls sharply, but it still highlights which assets are relatively more resilient than the rest.

Why can the overall score change even if the price barely moves?

Because the overall score combines components that can move without large price changes: rolling windows, volatility, current drawdowns, and your relative rank versus the universe. If other assets swing or catch up, your relative position can shift too.

How can you tell “quality” from “hype” using the overall score?

“Quality” tends to look balanced: solid performance or trend supported by a healthy stability profile - and it’s usually more stable over time. “Hype” often shows big jumps and strong imbalances (e.g., high trend/performance but weak stability). Use the overall score as a quick filter, then confirm with the component scores.