What investor type does Meta Platforms fit best in FoxScore?

Meta Platforms fits a more opportunity-seeking investor type in FoxScore: performance is the strongest sub-score. That suggests above-average historical returns — but check stability to ensure the performance wasn’t “paid for” with high volatility or deep drawdowns.

How meaningful is the available history for Meta Platforms?

Meta Platforms currently has about 13.8 years of price history since it started trading. That’s a solid base to interpret returns, drawdowns and trend behavior since launch — earlier market crises happened before the asset existed and are therefore not part of its history.

What is FoxScore good for — and what is it not for?

FoxScore is an analysis and comparison tool: it helps you sort assets quickly, compare profiles and spot strengths/weaknesses. It’s not a substitute for your own research or fundamental analysis, and it’s not a buy/sell recommendation.

Analysis for Meta Platforms

META · As of: 02/17/2026

Basic information

Type: Stock

Region: US

Sector: Communication Services

TER: –

History

Available history:13.8 years

Last tradingday:02/17/2026

Description & usage

Meta Platforms operates social networks and communication services including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger. Revenue comes primarily from digital advertising, with additional contributions from selected paid features and hardware/VR offerings. Its services are used globally by consumers, while advertisers across most industries purchase reach and targeting. A notable feature is its massive user base across multiple platforms, shaping both monetization and product development.

Scale: 0 = weak, 50 = average, 100 = top

Analysis summary

Meta Platforms (META) currently has a total score of 52 points, placing it in the neutral range. The score is made up of Performance (80), Stability (24) and Trend (23). The profile is clearly uneven: Performance stands out while Trend lags.

Performance scores 80 points (very strong). Key strength: 3Y return at 258.6 %. Main drag: 1Y return at -12.4 %.

Stability scores 24 points (weak). Key strength: CAGR/drawdown ratio at 0.27. Main drag: max drawdown (5Y) at -76.7 %. That indicates meaningful multi-year drawdowns. Higher Stability points are better and typically reflect calmer swings and smaller drawdowns—but prices can still fall.

Trend scores 23 points (weak). Trend signals are mostly negative right now. Least weak metric: trend strength at -0.23. Main drag: 12M momentum at -14.8 %.

Overall, the picture is mixed: Performance does the heavy lifting while Trend holds the score back. On a metric level, 3Y return stands out, while max drawdown (5Y) is the main weak spot.

(Historical evaluation, not investment advice.)

Chart anzeigen

Wenn du fortfährst, wird der Chart von TradingView geladen. Dabei können Daten (z. B. deine IP-Adresse) an TradingView übertragen werden.

Overall score

neutral

Scores

Metrics

FAQ

What investor type does Meta Platforms fit best in FoxScore?: Meta Platforms fits a more opportunity-seeking investor type in FoxScore: performance is the strongest sub-score. That suggests above-average historical returns — but check stability to ensure the performance wasn’t “paid for” with high volatility or deep drawdowns.
How meaningful is the available history for Meta Platforms?: Meta Platforms currently has about 13.8 years of price history since it started trading. That’s a solid base to interpret returns, drawdowns and trend behavior since launch — earlier market crises happened before the asset existed and are therefore not part of its history.
What is FoxScore good for — and what is it not for?: FoxScore is an analysis and comparison tool: it helps you sort assets quickly, compare profiles and spot strengths/weaknesses. It’s not a substitute for your own research or fundamental analysis, and it’s not a buy/sell recommendation.