Analysis for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Analysis summary
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) currently has a total score of 59 points, placing it in the neutral range. The score is made up of Performance (74), Stability (35) and Trend (59). The profile is clearly uneven: Performance stands out while Stability lags.
Performance scores 74 points (strong). Key strength: 10Y return at 734.1 %. Even the weakest return is still strong in absolute terms: 5Y return at 23.2 %.
Stability scores 35 points (weak). Key strength: CAGR/drawdown ratio at 0.39. Main drag: max drawdown (3Y) at -54.9 %. Higher Stability points are better and typically reflect calmer swings and smaller drawdowns—but prices can still fall.
Trend scores 59 points (neutral). Key strength: 12M momentum at 62.2 %. Weaker signal: Price is about 0.2 % below SMA50.
Overall, the picture is mixed: Performance does the heavy lifting while Stability holds the score back. On a metric level, 10Y return stands out, while max drawdown (3Y) is the main weak spot.
(Historical evaluation, not investment advice.)
Metrics
Performance
Stability
FAQ
- What investor type does ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF fit best in FoxScore?
- ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF fits a more opportunity-seeking investor type in FoxScore: performance is the strongest sub-score. That suggests above-average historical returns — but check stability to ensure the performance wasn’t “paid for” with high volatility or deep drawdowns.
- How meaningful is the available history for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF?
- ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF currently has about 11.4 years of price history since it started trading. That’s a solid base to interpret returns, drawdowns and trend behavior since launch — earlier market crises happened before the asset existed and are therefore not part of its history.
- What is FoxScore good for — and what is it not for?
- FoxScore is an analysis and comparison tool: it helps you sort assets quickly, compare profiles and spot strengths/weaknesses. It’s not a substitute for your own research or fundamental analysis, and it’s not a buy/sell recommendation.